![]() His Steveness replied, more or less, that people value music a lot more than than they value TV/video stuff, so for the time being, no video iPods. Let's rewind a bit (sorry for the tape-based analogy) to a MacWorld seemingly long, long ago.Īt the time, people were clamoring for Apple to include video in their next-generation iPods (they had just announced the iPod Photo, which was the very first iPod I ever owned.sometimes, not being an "early adopter' can pay off). ![]() When's the last time you saw a pink Audi or Merc? Mary Kay doesn't hand either of those out to its top sales stars, which is just as well.) Largely because of the things it appears to lack vis-a-vis the newest "fully-wired" iPods/iPhones: it doesn't have a phone function (d'oh!), it doesn't "do" wide-screen for video and games the way an iPhone/iPod Touch does, and.well, it doesn't seem as much fun, darn it! (Memo to the only-two-colors-available fashionistas: silver and black, being *classic* colors, go with everything. In a number of circles, the iPod Classic is now considered the "less sexy" iPod. (This is from an review I wrote in late 2008 I still own and use this iPod, and everything I wrote still applies, save for the fact that battery life has shortened noticeably over the last six months - not horribly so, but I can no longer go for a week between recharging as I typically would.) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |